Home Topics The Hill The Congress Blog The Pundit's Blog

KEY BLOGS
What they are saying today

Drudge Report
Drudge banners: "IOU" and links to this LA Times story on the budget crisis in California. And the U.S. says North Korea does not appear to be readying a missile launch in this Bloomberg story is also highlighed on Drudge. ... READ MORE

Huffington Post
The Huffington Post banners: "Obama's first major military operation underway in Afghanistan" and links to this AP story. Unemployment to hit a 9.6 percent, a 26 year high, according to this AP report, highlighted on the HuffPo. And Jesse Berney ... READ MORE

HotAir
The Obama administration doesn't see the contradiction between calling for free elections in Honduras and staying out of the election in Iran, writes Allahpundit. And veteran White House reporter Helen Thomas went "nuclear" on the White House for controlling the ... READ MORE

DailyKos
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) wants to president but "she couldn't even get her own campaign's scheduling staff to give her enough time to run," writes Jed Lewison. And South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford's (R) recent confessions have set off ... READ MORE

Townhall
South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford's (R) Republican enemies hope he stays in office, writes Matt Lewis. And, drawing on examples from other countries, Carol Platt Liebau writes what ObamaCare "really means." READ MORE

OpenLeft
Advancing the debate over torture is always going to be difficult, writes Daniel de Groot. And Mike Lux takes a look at the fight over a new Pecora commission. READ MORE

RedState
The press is "finally" calling out the Obama administration for controlling the press, writes Paint it Red. And Moe Lane takes a detailed look at the 2010 election and the ages of several Democratic committee chair people. READ MORE

MyDD
Mitt Romney appears to be urging Republicans to stand up to President Obama, writes Charles Lemos. And Lemos also writes that South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford (R) must think the Associated Press is a "licensed therapist." READ MORE

Powerline
Rep. Robert Wexler (D-Fla.) appeared to open the door to the Obama administration making more demands Israel in the peace process while in the country, writes Paul. And new polling shows that support for Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor is ... READ MORE

Matthew Yglesias
The entire committee system in Congress "leaves a lot to be desired," writes Matthew Yglesias. And Yglesias also points out a general thought among the punditry right now: Congress is asserting its dominance in setting and controlling the agenda, not ... READ MORE

CLICK FOR MORE
SUMMARIES



MORNING READ
MIDDAY BLOG ROUNDUP
DAY'S END ROUND-UP



You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

 

CLICK FOR MORE HILLTUBE

Morning Read | Midday Blog Roundup | Day's End Roundup

September 3, 2008

Huckabee's Wrong About Palin and Biden's Votes

@ 9:44 pm by Walter Alarkon

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) received one of the loudest cheers from GOP delegates Wednesday night when he joked about the few votes Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) got in his run for president.

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin "got more votes running for mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, than Joe Biden got running for president of the United States," Huckabee said.

But that's wrong.

Palin received 909 votes in her second and final run for mayor in 1999. Biden received the support of 2,328 delegates in the Iowa caucuses. Biden dropped out of the race after his fifth place finish there.

UPDATE: The number of caucus delegates that Biden received don't reflect the actual turnout in Iowa, according to the Assocated Press.

But according to another metric, Biden still received more backing than Palin. About 239,000 people turned out to vote in Iowa's Democratic caucuses. Biden received the backing of nearly 1 percent of delegates. If delegates were doled out roughly proportionally to the raw vote totals, Biden received the support of approximately 2,390 caucus-goers.

For the record, Palin got 617 votes in her first run for mayor in 1996. Combined with her re-election bid in 1999, Palin received 1,526 votes for mayor.

4 Comments »

The Hill welcomes comment from anyone and will almost always post it whether it is favorable or critical, as long as it is substantive and advances debate.
  1. Another lie associated with Palin's "credentials." Whaddyagonnado?

    If Palin is so qualified to head the nation, why has it been so necessary to embellish, outright lie and coverup to such a degree?

    Said 'no' to Congress on Bridge to Nowhere?… Nope. Based her race for gov. office on support for the bridge; but Congress cut the earmark (though not the funding). Congress said 'no' to Palin and Alaska on the bridge.
    Has opposed earmarks?… Nope; fully riding that gravy train.
    Stood-up to Ted Stevens?… Nope. In fact, worked closely with Stevens, headed-up a 527 for him, hired a lobbyist closely linked with Stevens, etc.
    Tax cutter?… Not as much as she raised taxes, especially on the working class.
    Fiscally prudent?… Ummm… Took over Wasilla with ZERO debt, and left 'em with $20+ million in the hole. OUCH!!

    The media has done a VERY poor job of vetting this candidate. Given her meager resume, all these lies and distortions should carry a LOT of weight is discrediting the manufactured facade. Only time will tell.

    Comment by plooger — September 4, 2008 @ 4:26 am

  2. It's not a lie by technicality. It's meant as humor. Biden got 0 votes for running for the President of the United States. He never made it that far (only votes in primaries /caucuses to become the party nominee). Get it?

    Comment by Jamie — September 5, 2008 @ 8:09 am

  3. Wow, that's got to be in the running for Rationalization of the Year, Jamie. You've got a GOVERNOR speaking from a prepared text presenting information that anyone listening would clearly understand as meaning to convey the impression that Gov. Palin received more votes running for mayor than Sen. Biden received as a candidate in the Democratic primaries. Yet, despite the huge chasm between what might technically be true and the truth as people are most likely to interpret it, Gov. Huckabee delivers the information anyway??? Come on, now, that's just despicable. I don't know ANYONE with a shred of moral fiber who would have delivered that DISTORTED comparison to a national audience of MILLIONS, when it is so blatantly obvious that it MISREPRESENTS the facts, again, as people are most likely to interpret them. Sure, it may not technically be a lie, based on a bastardized interpretation. But, it's a really sad commentary on anyone, Republican or not, if they believe that this is legitimate public discourse. It's one thing to put the best face on the facts, it's another to manipulate the facts to a point where they are no longer seated in reality. Without exception, every person I've spoken to about this particular comment has agreed that Gov. Huckabee should be ashamed of himself for having delivered it. Republicans love to present themselves as standing up for decency and integrity. Well, how about walking the walk and not just talking the talk?!

    Comment by Mark — September 7, 2008 @ 3:59 am

  4. Huckabee could have been talking about Biden's bid for the Dem nomination in 1988 in which he dropped out before the primaries and caucuses even began. So again, technically not a lie, but still pretty weak.

    Comment by Chris Schandevel — September 15, 2008 @ 8:22 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment




Privacy Policy
| Terms and Conditions
rss

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications Inc.